The Police Authorities of the Gujarat State are directed to handover all the records of the present case to the CBI within two weeks from this date and the CBI shall investigate all aspects of the case relating to the killing of Tulsiram Prajapati..

The Police Authorities of the Gujarat State are directed to handover all the records of the present case to the CBI within two weeks from this date and the CBI shall investigate all aspects of the case relating to the killing of Tulsiram Prajapati and file a report to the concerned court/special court having jurisdiction within a period of six months from the date of taking over of the investigation from the State Police Authorities. We also direct the Police Authorities of the State of Gujarat, Rajasthan and Andhra Pradesh to cooperate with the CBI Authorities in conducting the investigation. It is made clear that any observation made in this order is only for the limited purpose of deciding the issue whether investigation is to be handed over to the CBI or not and shall not be construed as expression of opinion on the merits of the case. Though the petitioner has prayed for compensation for the killing of her son, inasmuch as we direct the CBI to investigate and submit a report before the court concerned/special court within six months, depending on the outcome of the investigation, petitioner is permitted to move the said court for necessary direction for compensation and it is for the said court to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The writ petition is allowed on the above terms. 

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Anand Rao, had visited him in the Camp. It is also clear that at the time of apprehension/detention of Anand Rao, Sangeeta (sister), i.e. daughter of Aunt of Anand Rao was informed. This is recorded in the apprehension memo itself. On the question..

Anand Rao, had visited him in the Camp. It is also clear that at the time of apprehension/detention of Anand Rao, Sangeeta (sister), i.e. daughter of Aunt of Anand Rao was informed. This is recorded in the apprehension memo itself. On the question of age, the same has already been decided/opined by the Juvenile Justice Board. In case and if Anand Rao is We are also of the view that the petitioner was aware of the true facts and concealed the same in the writ petition. However, noticing the fact that the petitioner is a villager, we are inclined to give him benefit of doubt and do not impose costs. The writ petition stands dismissed. aggrieved by the said order, it is open to him to take appropriate steps as per law. We are also of the view that the petitioner was aware of the true facts and concealed the same in the writ petition. However, noticing the fact that the petitioner is a villager, we are inclined to give him benefit of doubt and do not impose costs. The writ petition stands dismissed.